Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-05 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 264 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action is a bit better than the Galaxy A20s, with a 78.5 score against 77. Although Motorola One Action and the Galaxy A20s were only released 2 months apart, Motorola One Action's construction is thicker but just a little bit lighter. Motorola One Action features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A20s. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores.
Motorola One Action features a better display than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2520 resolution and a lot higher screen pixels density. Motorola One Action has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola One Action also counts with a way better (4K) video definition.
Motorola One Action has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A20s, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A20s has just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.