Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-05 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A20s is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a general score of 77 against 75.8. Even when Samsung Galaxy A20s and nubia Red Magic 3S were released with only 0 months difference, Samsung Galaxy A20s is lighter and thinner. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A20s has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A20s, because it has a better display pixels density, a bit larger display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A20s, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a better performance than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A20s, because it has a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light environments, a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has improved battery duration than Galaxy A20s, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.