Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-05 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A20s is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70, getting a score of 77 against 76.9. Galaxy A20s has the same weight and thickness than Samsung Galaxy A70. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A20s has a more recent 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, so it gives some nice extra features.
The Galaxy A70 has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a little bigger display, more pixels per screen inch and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy A70 features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A70 also has more internal memory.
Galaxy A70 has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A70 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A20s shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a way smaller sensor which provides a lot lower photo and video quality and a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images, they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates.
The Galaxy A70 has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A20s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.