Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-05 | -- |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A20s's 77 general score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy S25 has 14 version and Galaxy A20s has Android 11 version, giving you some extra features. The Galaxy S25 body is much lighter and notably thinner than Galaxy A20s.
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much better display than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340px resolution and a much greater display pixels density. Galaxy A20s counts with a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A20s has a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a battery life that's very similar to the Galaxy A20s one.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality and a camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.