Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-05 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A20s is slightly better than Galaxy S7 Active, with a general score of 77 against 75.8. The Galaxy A20s is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it is also a bit lighter and way thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy A20s and Samsung Galaxy S7 Active both count with extremely similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has 4 less CPU cores , they both have the same RAM amount.
Galaxy S7 Active features an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and much more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy S7 Active shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels back camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A20s features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's battery performance is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A20s's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.