Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-05 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 264 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Compact is just a bit better than Galaxy A20s, with a global score of 79 against 77. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but Xperia XZ2 Compact has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A20s has Android 11. Although Xperia XZ2 Compact is older and thicker than the Galaxy A20s, it's design is still just a little lighter.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater screen pixel density and a way higher 1080 x 2160px resolution. The Galaxy A20s features a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A20s also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A20s. They have the same RAM amount and 8 processing cores. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, it also counts with a way higher video quality, a way more mega pixels camera and a lot larger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy A20s features a really longer battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.