Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-05 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 264 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A20s's 77 score. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version while Galaxy A20s has Android 11. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison, it must be noted that it is also heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a brighter display than Galaxy A20s, because it has a bit bigger display, more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a much higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera, a lot better (4K) video resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's memory to store more apps and games is just as good as the Galaxy A20s one, they have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.