Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A21, getting a global score of 80 against 76.1. The Google Pixel 3 is an older phone than the Samsung Galaxy A21, but it is a bit thinner and lighter anyway. Google Pixel 3 features a better looking display than Galaxy A21, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better amount of pixels per inch of display and a lot better 1080 x 2160 resolution.
Google Pixel 3 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A21, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 3 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A21, because although it has a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A21 counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A21 counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 37% more battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 3 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.