Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-29 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A21, having an 81.9 score against 76.1. The Google Pixel 4 is a somewhat lighter device than the Samsung Galaxy A21, but both of them are 0.32inches thick. The Google Pixel 4 features a better looking display than Galaxy A21, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a much higher screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy A21 features a superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 4 counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy A21, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A21 counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Google Pixel 4 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A21, because although it has a back camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A21, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A21. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A21, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.