Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-06-29 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A21, having a global score of 77 against 76.1. The LG G7 Fit construction is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A21, although it was released just a little further than a year before. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but LG G7 Fit has the newer 8.1 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy A21 has Android 10 version.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a lot more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A21 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, because although it has 1 GB less RAM, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
The LG G7 Fit has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A21, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG G7 Fit also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A21 has better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
LG G7 Fit has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has a smaller aperture and a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.