Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-06-29 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 has a general score of 78.6, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A21's 76.1 overall score. The LG V10 is an extremely older and a little bit thicker phone than the Galaxy A21, but LG managed to make it just a bit lighter anyway. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V10 has an older 5.1 version and Galaxy A21 has Android 10.
The Galaxy A21 features a better CPU than LG V10, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster). The LG V10 features a way better looking screen than Galaxy A21, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better quantity of pixels per display inch and a lot better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The LG V10 counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A21, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The LG V10 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A21, and although they both have the same aperture and the same resolution back-facing camera, the LG V10 also has a larger back camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A21 features longer battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.
Although LG V10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A21, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A21. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy A21, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.