Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-29 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A21's score of 76.1. LG V35 ThinQ's design is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy A21, although it was released many years before. LG V35 ThinQ has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A21, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater amount of pixels per display inch and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A21, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A21, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A21 features better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 21% larger battery size. LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A21, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking lower quality videos and images, and they both have a 16 mega-pixels back-facing camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited environments and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The LG V35 ThinQ is more expensive than the Galaxy A21, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.