Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-29 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black | Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 9.35 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A21's 76.1 global score. Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but LG V60 ThinQ has newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A21 has Android 10. Although it's the best in this review, LG V60 ThinQ is an a little thicker and somewhat heavier device than Samsung Galaxy A21.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A21, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG V60 ThinQ features a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A21, because it has a higher display pixels density, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a little bit bigger screen.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A21, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A21, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
LG V60 ThinQ has better battery lifetime than Galaxy A21, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A21, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.