Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-29 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Samsung Galaxy A21, having a overall score of 87.1 against 76.1. Although Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy A21, it is just a bit heavier and just a little thicker. These devices use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A21 has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy A21 counts with a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 9 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A21, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, more pixels per display inch and a bit larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot better camera than Galaxy A21, because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality photos and videos and a larger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in low light situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A21, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.