Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black | Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 194.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A21 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Power, with a score of 76.1 against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy A21 design is a little bit lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G Power, although both of them were released only 2 months apart. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A21 has older 10 version and Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy A21 counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G Power, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Moto G Power features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2300.
The Motorola Moto G Power features a quite bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A21, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Motorola Moto G Power also has more internal memory capacity. Moto G Power captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A21, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the Moto G Power also has a lot better 3840x2160 video definition, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with greater battery life than Galaxy A21, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy A21 is a better device, it is more expensive than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Power. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy A21, else you can save some money and get the Moto G Power, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.