Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-06-29 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 194.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A21 is a bit better than the Moto Z Force, with a 76.1 score against 75.8. These devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A21 has the older 10 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Samsung Galaxy A21 is a newer cellphone than Moto Z Force, although it is heavier and thicker.
The Galaxy A21 features a bit superior processing unit than Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with 4 more cores. Moto Z Force has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater number of pixels per screen inch and a way higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z Force features a much better storage for applications and games than Galaxy A21, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto Z Force has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A21, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a much better (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A21 has just a bit longer battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy A21 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.