Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-29 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 194.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the Galaxy A21, with a general score of 87 against 76.1. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has a more recent 11 version and Galaxy A21 has Android 10, so it counts with a couple nice extra features. Motorola razr (2020)'s design is a little thinner and a little lighter than the Galaxy A21, even though they were released only 3 months apart.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A21, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola razr (2020) features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A21, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better resolution of 876 x 2142.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola razr (2020) features a very superior camera than Galaxy A21, because it has a way better (4K) video quality, a much bigger sensor, a back camera with a way better 48 MP resolution and a larger camera aperture for better low light images and videos.
Galaxy A21 features a very superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 43 percent larger battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A21, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A21. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Galaxy A21, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.