Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-29 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Galaxy A21, having a 98 score against 76.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version while Galaxy A21 has Android 10 version. Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, it must be noted that it's also a a bit thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better display than Galaxy A21, because it has a bit bigger screen, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a way greater pixels count per inch of display. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A21, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little better performance than Galaxy A21, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features superior battery performance than Galaxy A21, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A21, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot higher video quality, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos and videos and a way more mega-pixels camera.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A21, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A21. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A21, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.