Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-29 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 194.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A21's 76.1 score. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A21 has Android 10 version. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A21 were released only a few months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A21, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a little larger display and a much better display pixels density. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A21, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A21, because although it has a camera with a lot lower 12 MP resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a larger camera sensor shooting better quality photographs and videos and a way better (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A21 has improved battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21% larger battery size.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A21, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.