Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-06-19 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro is way better than Galaxy A21s, getting a general score of 93.3 against 77.7. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy A21s works with Android 10 operating system. The iPhone 13 Pro design is newer and somewhat thinner, but also just a bit heavier than Galaxy A21s.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a quite superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and 3 GB more RAM memory. Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater amount of pixels per inch in the display and a way higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels.
The Galaxy A21s has just a bit better camera than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A21s also counts with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera. The iPhone 13 Pro features a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A21s, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A21s has a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.