Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A21s, with a general score of 80 against 77.7. Google Pixel 3 is an older device than the Samsung Galaxy A21s, but Google was able to make it thinner and notably lighter anyway. Google Pixel 3 counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a much better 1080 x 2160 resolution.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A21s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A21s counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A21s also counts with a lot larger sensor and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A21s counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A21s counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.