Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is much better than the Galaxy A21s's score of 77.7. Although the Google Pixel 5 and Galaxy A21s were released with only a couple of months difference, the Google Pixel 5 is thinner and notably lighter. Google Pixel 5 features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A21s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 5 has a much better screen than Galaxy A21s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per screen inch and a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy A21s, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A21s shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A21s also counts with a way bigger sensor and a way higher 48 megapixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A21s has improved battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.