Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.78 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Galaxy A21s, having a general score of 87.1 against 77.7. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a little heavier than the Galaxy A21s, it's a little thinner and extremely newer. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Galaxy A21s has Android 10, providing the user a couple nice extra features.
The Galaxy A21s has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better display than Galaxy A21s, because it has a greater pixel number per inch of display, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better camera than Galaxy A21s, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a larger aperture, a camera in the back with a higher 50 MP resolution and a lot larger sensor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A21s, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A21s counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.