Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is a bit better than Galaxy A21s, having a score of 78.5 against 77.7. The Motorola One Action construction is just a little lighter than Galaxy A21s, although it's a little bit thicker and was released around 10 months before. Motorola One Action features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels.
Motorola One Action features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola One Action also has 1 GB more RAM. Galaxy A21s counts with a superior camera than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A21s also counts with a camera with a way better 48 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola One Action features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A21s has a much longer battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.