Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Samsung Galaxy A21s, having a global score of 87 against 77.7. These devices come with Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has a more recent 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A21s has Android 10 version, giving a lot of extra features and performance improvements. Motorola razr (2020) is a somewhat thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A21s, but both have equal weights.
The Motorola razr (2020) has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 5 GB more RAM. The Motorola razr (2020) features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 876 x 2142px.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A21s, and although they both have a 48 mega pixels resolution back camera and the same sensor size, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments.
Motorola razr (2020) features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy A21s counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.