Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | -- |
| TFT | LTPO |
| 270 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has an overall score of 79.2, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A21s's 77.7 global score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the newer 15 version while Galaxy A21s has Android 10, providing you some extra features and performance optimizations. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s construction is notably newer and noticeably thinner, but also a little heavier than Galaxy A21s.
The Samsung Galaxy A21s has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display. Galaxy A21s features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A21s, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a back camera with a higher resolution and a larger aperture. Galaxy A21s has a bit better battery duration than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.