Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is better than Galaxy A21s's global score of 77.7. The Galaxy A52 5G is a newer cellphone, and it is also a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Galaxy A21s. Both phones in this review use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Galaxy A21s has Android 10 version, providing the user some extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a better display than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a better screen pixel density and a much better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A21s, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A21s features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a better camera than Galaxy A21s, because it has a way more mega pixels camera, a larger sensor which offers a better image and video quality, a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.