Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is a bit better than Galaxy A21s's 77.7 overall score. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover Pro has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy A21s has Android 10, giving a couple additional features and performance improvements. Although the Galaxy XCover Pro is better than Galaxy A21s, we must tell that it's also somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A21s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot higher display pixel density. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A21s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has 64 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A21s captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A21s also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A21s features better battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.