Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Samsung Galaxy A21s, getting a general score of 92.3 against 77.7. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a a bit lighter and thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy A21s, although both were only released 2 months apart. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A21s has Android 10 version, providing the user a lot of extra features and a performance increase.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A21s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because it has a bit bigger display, a way better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a way better screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy A21s has a very superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52 percent more battery capacity.
Galaxy A21s counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A21s also counts with a way more MP back camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.