Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-06-24 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, having a 93.3 score against 84.6. Although the iPhone 13 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A22 5G were released only a couple months apart, the iPhone 13 Pro body is thinner but also just a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11 operating system.
IPhone 13 Pro has a better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64-bits CPU. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the display and a bit higher 1170 x 2532 resolution.
Galaxy A22 5G features a slightly better camera than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and videos in poorly lited situations and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Galaxy A22 5G features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a really longer battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 62 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.