Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-06-24 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's 84.6 general score. Even though iPhone 13 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G were released only a few months apart, iPhone 13 Pro Max's design is thinner but also somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy A22 5G comes with Android 11 OS.
IPhone 13 Pro Max features a superior processing unit than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory and a 64-bits CPU. IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a quite bigger screen, a bit higher resolution of 1284 x 2778px and a bit better pixel quantity per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A22 5G has just a little better battery performance than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 15 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy A22 5G shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures in low light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a much higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.