Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A22 5G's 84.6 general score. The iPhone X is an notably older device than the Galaxy A22 5G, but Apple was able to build it somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. The Apple iPhone X has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a bit greater pixels density.
The iPhone X has a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. IPhone X has a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has just a bit better camera than iPhone X, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A22 5G features a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.