Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than iPhone XR, with an 84.6 score against 82. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G design is notably newer than the iPhone XR's, but it is a little thicker and a little bit heavier. Apple iPhone XR counts with a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone XR features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, although it has a quite smaller screen, a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display and a much lower resolution of 828 x 1792px. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a much better memory to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A22 5G shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same aperture, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera. The Galaxy A22 5G features a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.