Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G is a little bit better than iPhone XS, with an 84.6 score against 84.2. Galaxy A22 5G's design is much newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than the iPhone XS. IPhone XS has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436px.
The Galaxy A22 5G counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. Apple iPhone XS features a quite better processing power than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has 2 less cpu cores (but faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a much better battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.