Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than Google Pixel 3, having an 84.6 score against 80. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a newer cellphone than Google Pixel 3, but it's notably heavier and somewhat thicker. The Google Pixel 3 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A22 5G. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 3 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater screen density. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh. Galaxy A22 5G shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, a same size aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a back camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.