Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, having a global score of 84.6 against 80.7. The Galaxy A22 5G is a a lot newer cellphone than the Google Pixel 3 XL, although it is thicker and a bit heavier. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit better looking display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and more pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB. Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit better performance than Galaxy A22 5G. Both have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a back camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 46 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.