Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than Google Pixel 4, having a overall score of 84.6 against 81.9. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's body is newer than the Google Pixel 4's, but it's a lot heavier and just a little thicker. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit better display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixel number in each inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A22 5G features a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A22 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A22 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a camera in the back with much more MP.
Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.