Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 overall score. Although Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is newer than the Google Pixel 4 XL, it is a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 3040 resolution. The Galaxy A22 5G has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a camera with a much better resolution.
The Galaxy A22 5G has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A22 5G also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A22 5G counts with improved battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.