Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a, having an 84.6 score against 82.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is newer than Google Pixel 4a, it is heavier and just a bit thicker. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
The Google Pixel 4a features a bit better screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite greater count of pixels in each screen inch. Galaxy A22 5G has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.