Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A22 5G's 84.6 global score. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is just a little thinner and lighter than the Galaxy A22 5G, even though they were released with only 7 months difference. These devices include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A22 5G has better battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
Galaxy A22 5G features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a lot better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.