Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is a bit better than Galaxy A22 5G's 84.6 overall score. Although the Google Pixel 5 and the Galaxy A22 5G were released with only 8 months difference, the Google Pixel 5 is lighter and thinner. The Google Pixel 5 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater screen density.
Google Pixel 5 has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM. The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy A22 5G has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A22 5G has better battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.