Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 399 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than HTC One M9, with an 84.6 score against 77.7. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has the newer 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it provides the user some extra features. Even though Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is way heavier than the HTC One M9, it's just a little bit thinner and also noticeably newer.
HTC One M9 features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features much more memory to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The HTC One M9 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits CPU and an additional GPU. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 76 percent more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G shoots just a bit better photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a much better resolution camera and a bigger camera aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.