Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra, with an 84.6 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G construction is incredibly newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than HTC U Ultra. The HTC U Ultra counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher display density.
The Galaxy A22 5G features just a bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a larger number of faster cores. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the same diafragm aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a lot better resolution back camera.
HTC U Ultra has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a much longer battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.