Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G has a score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than HTC U11's general score of 77.6. Galaxy A22 5G's design is way newer than the HTC U11's, although it is somewhat thicker and heavier. HTC U11 counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels count in each inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Galaxy A22 5G has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. HTC U11 counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A22 5G. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a much better battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 67% greater battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G shoots a bit better photographs and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.