Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-06-24 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a general score of 84.6, which is slightly better than LG G7 Fit's general score of 77. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's body is much newer than LG G7 Fit's, although it's a lot heavier and thicker.
The LG G7 Fit features a more vivid display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a bit more powerful processor than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has 4 more CPU cores.
Galaxy A22 5G shoots clearer photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a much more mega pixels back camera and a bigger camera aperture. The Galaxy A22 5G features a little bit more storage capacity for applications and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has an external memory slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A22 5G features a much better battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.