Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-06-24 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than the LG G7 ThinQ, getting a score of 84.6 against 81. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A22 5G has 11 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though Galaxy A22 5G is noticeably newer than LG G7 ThinQ, it is thicker and a lot heavier.
The LG G7 ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A22 5G. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The LG G7 ThinQ has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a higher display density.
Galaxy A22 5G and LG G7 ThinQ count with incredibly similar cameras, because although the LG G7 ThinQ has a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality. The LG G7 ThinQ has more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a much better battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.