Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-24 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a little bit better than the LG G8 ThinQ, with an 84.6 score against 84.3. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has the previous 11 version while LG G8 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is notably newer than LG G8 ThinQ, it is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG G8 ThinQ also has more RAM. LG G8 ThinQ counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
The Galaxy A22 5G features a little bit better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light captures and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels.
The LG G8 ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A22 5G counts with a way better battery duration than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.