Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-24 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a little bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ, with a score of 84.6 against 82.7. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a more recent 11 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10, so it offers a couple additional features and a performance increase. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a newer device than the LG G8X ThinQ, although it's a little bit heavier and a little thicker.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more RAM. LG G8X ThinQ features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel density.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A22 5G captures a bit better pictures and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a way better 48 MP resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with greater battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.