Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than the LG V10's overall score of 78.6. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a newer 11 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's body is noticeably newer than the LG V10's, although it's a little heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a superior processor than LG V10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a larger number of cores (and faster). The LG V10 has a brighter screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixels number in each display inch.
LG V10 features a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V10 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V10 captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a camera with way less mega pixels, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the LG V10 also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy A22 5G has a much longer battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.