Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-06-24 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ, getting an 84.6 score against 82.5. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a a lot newer phone than the LG V30S ThinQ, although it is notably heavier and thicker. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has the previous 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A22 5G, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A22 5G shoots a little bit better photos and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Galaxy A22 5G has a really longer battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.